© 2026 PCMA. All Rights Reserved.

Don’t Let Government-Forced Pharmacy Closures Restrict Hoosier Patient Access
REJECT Senate Bill 173
Senate Bill 173 will result in government-forced closures of pharmacies and devastate prescription drug access for millions of Indiana patients who rely on medications the most. This legislation would prohibit pharmacy ownership by pharmacy benefit managers, eliminating choices that have kept medication costs low and provided reliable access for Hoosiers of all backgrounds.
Senate Bill 173 would also prevent employers from choosing the health plans that work best for their workforce. Instead of letting employers and workers decide, this bill puts government in control—a decision that will harm patients managing chronic conditions or facing life-threatening illnesses who are most vulnerable to pharmacy closures.
Government-mandated forced pharmacy closures make care harder to find when patients need it most. Lawmakers haven’t been transparent about the real consequences. While claiming to help patients, evidence shows this legislation will create the opposite effect. Here’s what Senate Bill 173 would actually do:
What Senate Bill 173 Would Do:
[1] Data is from four large PBMs in Indiana.
[2] Source: JAMA, Pharmacy Closures and Anticonvulsant Medication Prescription Fills, 2024

Indiana patients and employers shouldn’t be forced out of competitive health plan options. The PBM market is competitive and dynamic, with more than 70 full-service PBMs operating today. The solution to health care affordability isn’t government mandates—it’s preserving choice and competition that drive down costs for working families.
Indiana families are already stretched thin. Hoosiers cannot afford legislation that limits their pharmacy options, eliminates cost-saving tools, and raises prescription drug costs.


